Insights / UK Law Firm SEO & AI Search

Getting cited in ChatGPT: what actually works for UK firms in 2026

By the time this is published, ChatGPT will have crossed eight hundred million weekly users. For an increasing share of those users, ChatGPT has replaced Google as the first place they ask questions โ€” including the considered-purchase questions that lead to a shortlist of suppliers. If youโ€™re not in those answers, youโ€™re not on the shortlist.

This is what actually works to get cited โ€” in 2026, in the UK, for firms with the kind of substance buyers expect.

1. Be a recognised entity, not just a website

ChatGPT cites sources it can verify. That means your firm needs to exist as a clear entity โ€” named experts with bios, consistent address and identity signals across the web, proper Organisation and Person schema, sameAs links to LinkedIn and professional registers. Entity work isnโ€™t glamorous but itโ€™s table stakes. AI systems wonโ€™t cite a firm they canโ€™t verify.

2. Publish answer-shaped content under named authors

The content patterns that get cited in ChatGPT are remarkably consistent: a clear answer near the top, named claims with verifiable sourcing, plain language, structured headings, FAQs where they fit naturally. Walls of marketing copy donโ€™t get cited. Detailed practical commentary by a named expert does.

The byline matters. โ€œBy The Firmโ€ signals content marketing. โ€œBy [named solicitor, named adviser, named consultant]โ€ signals expertise that AI systems weight more heavily.

3. Get the foundational schema right

FAQPage on pages that answer real questions. Service schema on service pages. Person schema on every author. Schema isnโ€™t a magic ranking factor but itโ€™s how AI systems efficiently parse and verify your content. Get it right once and it pays back for years.

4. Optimise for the prompts buyers actually use

Most firms test โ€œwhat is X serviceโ€ type prompts. The interesting ones are the commercial prompts: โ€œBest [practice area] solicitor in [city]โ€, โ€œWho should I use for [specific service]โ€, โ€œ[firm name] vs [competitor name]โ€. Run them monthly across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AI Overviews. Track where you appear, where you donโ€™t, and how the answers describe you.

5. Provide an llms.txt and clean structured exports

Newer AI systems look for an llms.txt file describing your siteโ€™s structure and key content. Clean structured data exports (FAQs, services, locations) help them parse your site efficiently. These are still optional in 2026; theyโ€™ll be expected by 2027.

What doesnโ€™t work

Keyword-stuffed content. Generic AI-generated articles published at high volume. Trying to game citation rates with paid mentions. ChatGPTโ€™s training and retrieval systems are explicitly tuned against this kind of content โ€” publishing it is more likely to damage your visibility than improve it.

If you want to know how your firm actually appears in ChatGPT today, thatโ€™s a thirty-minute conversation. The intro call is here. Or look at how AI search optimisation runs as an engagement.

Gregg King
About the author

Gregg King

Independent senior SEO and AI search visibility consultant for UK law firms. SRA, LSS and LSNI aware throughout. Warrington-based, working with law firms across the UK on a selective basis.

Read more about how I work โ†’
Currently accepting selective engagements

Want this thinking applied to your firm?

Book a 30-minute intro call. Direct conversation about your firm, your market, and where the realistic upside is. No pitch deck.